Performance Measurement Frameworks to Improve Service Delivery Outcomes in Urban Public Agencies: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jmrr/V2E7/2026-04Keywords:
Performance measurement frameworks, Service delivery, Urban public agencies, Public administration.Abstract
Performance measurement frameworks have been widely adopted across public sector organizations as instruments of accountability and service improvement, yet the evidence on whether they reliably translate into improved service delivery outcomes in urban public agencies remains geographically uneven. This review addresses that gap by systematically examining the design characteristics, implementation conditions, and service delivery effects of performance measurement frameworks adopted by urban public agencies across diverse institutional and geographic contexts, while identifying the conditions that enable or constrain effective implementation. In line with PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searches were conducted across multiple databases, covering peer-reviewed journal articles published from 2010 to the present; 26 studies met all inclusion criteria and were retained for analysis. Thematic synthesis guided the analytical process. The evidence indicates that no single framework type predominates globally, with adoption shaped by institutional context and administrative capacity as much as by technical design considerations. The average effect of performance management on public organizational performance is modest, and improvement is conditional on the quality of framework design, purposeful managerial engagement with performance data, and the strategic alignment between measurement systems and organizational priorities. Governance design alignment, political incentive structures, and managerial culture emerged as the primary determinants of whether implementation produces substantive service improvement or ceremonial compliance. Overall, the value of performance measurement frameworks is recognized in the institutional seriousness and managerial commitment with which they are embedded and sustained.
References
1) Agyei, E. O. (2026). Administrative process improvement approaches for reducing service delays in city governments: A systematic review. EPRA International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies (EBMS), 13(4), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra26808
2) Agyei, E. O. (2026). A review of digital strategies for strengthening public service delivery systems. Sarcouncil Journal of Public Administration and Management, 5(2), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19545478
3) Andersen, S. C., & Nielsen, H. S. (2020). Learning from performance information. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3), 415-431. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz036
4) Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., Law, J., & Walker, R. M. (2011). Strategy implementation and public service performance. Administration & society, 43(6), 643-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711412730
5) Beeri, I., Uster, A., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2019). Does performance management relate to good governance? A study of its relationship with citizens’ satisfaction with and trust in Israeli local government. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(2), 241-279.https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1436074
6) Brusca, I., Manes Rossi, F., & Aversano, N. (2017). Performance measurement in Italian and Spanish local governments: Comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(5), 470-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2015.1094892
7) Downe, J., Grace, C., Martin, S., & Nutley, S. (2010). Theories of public service improvement: A comparative analysis of local performance assessment frameworks. Public Management Review, 12(5), 663-678. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719031003633201
8) Gębczyńska, A., & Brajer-Marczak, R. (2020). Review of selected performance measurement models used in public administration. Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040099
9) Gerrish, E. (2016). The impact of performance management on performance in public organizations: A meta‐analysis. Public administration review, 76(1), 48-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12433
10) Gomes, R. C., & de Azevedo, C. B. (2025). Balanced Scorecard: A literature review to trace its trajectory in the public administration domain. International Journal of Public Administration, 48(8), 502-518. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2024.2376053
11) Han, X., & Moynihan, D. (2022). Does managerial use of performance information matter to organizational outcomes?. The American review of public administration, 52(2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740211048891
12) Jie, G. (2015). Political rationality vs. technical rationality in China's target-based performance measurement system: The case of social stability maintenance. Policy and Society, 34(1), 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.03.005
13) Johnsen, Å., Solholm, K., & Tufte, P. A. (2024). Performance measurement system design as link between strategy formulation and performance information use in public sector organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 47(4), 813-848. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2360158
14) van der Kolk, B. (2022). Performance measurement in the public sector: Mapping 20 years of survey research. Financial Accountability & Management, 38(4), 703-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12345
15) Král, M. (2022). 20-year history of performance measurement in the local public sector: a systematic review. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(9), 726-740. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1891425
16) Lapuente, V., & Van de Walle, S. (2020). The effects of new public management on the quality of public services. Governance, 33(3), 461-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12502
17) Lewis, J. M. (2015). The politics and consequences of performance measurement. Policy and Society, 34(1), 1-12.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.03.001
18) Meng, X., & Li, C. (2025). Does public sector performance information impact stakeholders? Evidence from a meta‐analysis. Public administration review, 85(4), 1086-1097. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13924
19) Moullin, M. (2017). Improving and evaluating performance with the Public Sector Scorecard. International journal of productivity and performance management, 66(4), 442-458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2015-0092
20) Moynihan, D. P., & Kroll, A. (2016). Performance management routines that work? An early assessment of the GPRA Modernization Act. Public Administration Review, 76(2), 314-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12434
21) Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: why do managers use performance information? Journal of public administration research and theory, 20(4), 849-866. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq004
22) Northcott, D., & Ma'amora Taulapapa, T. (2012). Using the balanced scorecard to manage performance in public sector organizations: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 25(3), 166-191. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551211224234
23) Obodai, T., Tracy, T., & Singh, D., Oman-Amoako, M. (2025). The role of financial analytics in enhancing public sector accountability in the U.S. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review, 13(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra24426
24) Sandfort, J., Ong, S. J., & McKay, C. (2019). Performance management regimes in practice: Examining the local agencies implementing temporary assistance for needy families. The American review of public administration, 49(2), 145-158.https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018809202
25) Schoeman, I., & Chakwizira, J. (2023). Advancing a performance management tool for service delivery in local government. Administrative Sciences, 13(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020031
26) Tillema, S., Mimba, N. P. S., & Van Helden, G. J. (2010). Understanding the changing role of public sector performance measurement in less developed countries. Public administration and development, 30(3), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.561
27) Turley, G., Robbins, G., & McNena, S. (2015). A framework to measure the financial performance of local governments. Local government studies, 41(3), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2014.991865
28) Virani, A., & Van Der Wal, Z. (2023). Enhancing the effectiveness of public sector performance regimes: A proposed causal model for aligning governance design with performance logics. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 6(1), 54-65.https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvac026
29) Walker, R. M., Brewer, G. A., Boyne, G. A., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2011). Market orientation and public service performance: new public management gone mad?. Public administration review, 71(5), 707-717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02410.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Emmanuel Owusu Agyei , Matthew Oman-Amoako (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
