AI-Augmented Leadership and Employee Voice Behaviour: Exploring the Roles of Trust and Empowerment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-jmrr/V2E8/2026-05Keywords:
AI-augmented leadership, employee voice behaviour, trust, psychological empowerment, psychological safety, algorithmic control, human-AI collaborationAbstract
As organisations increasingly embed artificial intelligence (AI) into the routines of leadership, from predictive performance dashboards to AI-assisted feedback and coaching tools, a pressing but underexamined question is how this technological augmentation of leadership shapes employees' willingness to speak up. This paper develops and defends a conceptual model in which AI-augmented leadership predicts employee voice behaviour through two theoretically distinct but interlocking psychological mechanisms: trust in the combined leader-AI system, and psychological empowerment. Drawing on social exchange theory) the integrative model of organisational trust, Spreitzer's theory of psychological empowerment, and the growing empirical literature on trust in artificial intelligence, the paper argues that AI-augmented leadership is neither inherently emancipatory nor inherently silencing; its consequences for voice depend on whether it is experienced by employees as a resource that expands judgement and relational engagement or as a mechanism of algorithmic control that narrows it. The paper further situates trust and empowerment within the longer-standing voice literature on psychological safety and implicit theories of self-censorship, showing how these established constructs sharpen, rather than duplicate, the proposed model. Five research propositions are advanced, a boundary condition involving AI transparency is specified, and a research agenda for empirically testing the model is outlined. The paper contributes to the emerging literature on AI and leadership by reframing the central question from whether AI replaces leaders to how leaders' use of AI is interpreted by employees, and by clarifying the specific psychological pathways through which that interpretation either encourages or forecloses constructive dissent.
References
1) Bai, Y., & He, H. (2025). The “double-edged sword” effect of shared leadership on employee voice behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1560554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1560554
2) Baran, M. (2025). AI-augmented leadership: Redefining leaders' style and competencies. In AI and Humanistic Management (pp. 147-169). Routledge
3) Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
4) Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279183
5) Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 461–488. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61967925
6) Dutta, D., Mishra, S. K., & Tyagi, D. (2023). Augmented employee voice and employee engagement using artificial intelligence-enabled chatbots: A field study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(12), 2451–2480.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2085525
7) Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
8) Gao, A., & Jiang, J. (2019). Perceived empowering leadership, harmonious passion, and employee voice: The moderating role of job autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01484
9) Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627–660. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0057
10) Hu, Y., Zhu, L., Zhou, M., Li, J., Maguire, P., Sun, H., & Wang, D. (2018). Exploring the influence of ethical leadership on voice behavior: How leader-member exchange, psychological safety and psychological empowerment influence employees’ willingness to speak out. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1718. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01718
11) Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
12) Liu, J., Huang, M., Cui, M., Tian, G., & Li, X. (2025). The positive effects of employee AI dependence on voice behavior—Based on power dependence theory. Behavioral Sciences, 15(12), Article 1709. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15121709
13) Marangozoglu, S. (2025). Reconstructing Leadership: The Convergence of Leadership Theories and AI-Driven Decision-Making (Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität Wien).
14) Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
15) Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373–412. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.574506
16) Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328
17) Morrison, E. W. (2023). Employee voice and silence: Taking stock a decade later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 79–107. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-054654
18) Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001
19) Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.2307/256865
20) Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4310926
21) Zhang, Q., Wang, F., Liao, G., & Li, M. (2025). How does AI trust foster innovative performance under paternalistic leadership? The roles of AI crafting and leader’s AI opportunity perception. Behavioral Sciences, 15(8), Article 1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15081064
22) Zhang, X., Yu, D., & Yang, J. (2025). Discovering the dark side of AI and algorithmic HRM: Evidence from negative experiences of employees on online delivery platforms. SAGE Open, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251405329
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Kingsley Ikwunga Amadi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
